Maatouks Law Group, are driving forward a number of critical legal claims in relation to the inconsistencies in the application of state and territory public health and emergency legislation, which has been applied upon large groups of individuals, with the mandating of medical intervention.
Maatouks Law Group have now spearheaded the first action representing the nurses in NSW at the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. This action will form the basis of all other actions we are about to file for all other sectors across the States and Territories.
We are prepared to fight this issue at every level and we are very proud of the research and presentation of these arguments. There is wider scope for filing an appeal from the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal to the higher courts, and this allows us to focus on the failures of science rather than just debate human rights and entitlements as they apply in emergencies.
This is the first action as part of a wider strategy, to be adopted across all states and territories, to deal specifically with Sectors that are impacted, as well as the unique laws that impact each respective state and territory.
Maatouks Law Group are going to diversify our strategy and file the following actions and all existing actions including the National Class Action and NSW Class Action will be included as part of this strategy:
In NSW; we are going to target specific sectors, being the Teachers/Educators, the Care Services sector and the Air Transport and Quarantine sectors. We are seeking a lead applicant in each of these three categories. We invite you to express your interest, again or for the first time, in being part of the group, or a lead representative in any of these actions by clicking the link on our website and completing the State and Sector you are in.
In Victoria; the Public Health Act 2008 VIC, is far more flexible than NSW, and it is also specific in that a vaccination order must be affected through section 117 of the PHA 2008 VIC. Furthermore, there are no restrictions on bringing a tortious claim against the Government; as such, this means, that if there is negligence, or a breach of statutory duty in making these mandates, then both the individuals as decision makers in Government, as well as the Government itself, can be made liable. For this reason, we are considering a Federal court action in Victoria, to challenge inconsistencies within the legislation, as well as liability for tortious conduct. This will also provide us the opportunity to put our extensively compiled evidence before the Court. We invite you to express your interest, again or for the first time, in being part of the group, or a lead representative in any of these actions by clicking the link on our website and completing the State and Sector you are in.
In Western Australia; we will also be tackling the issues in relation to the Government’s failure to correctly apply the Public Health Act 2016 WA, such that; public health orders can only be made to an individual for the purpose of vaccination. Government cannot make generic public health orders on groups of individuals for the purposes of vaccination. We will also be seeking a lead for this purpose and we will be addressing key industries, such as FIFO, Health Care workers, Teachers, Mining and all other impacted industries. We invite you to express your interest, again or for the first time, in being part of the group, or a lead representative in any of these actions by clicking the link on our website and completing the State and Sector you are in.
We will also be tackling mandates and legislation in South Australia, Tasmania, Queensland and the Territories. We invite you to express your interest, again or for the first time, in being part of the group, or a lead representative in any of these actions by clicking the link on our website and completing the State and Sector you are in.
Ultimately; we will be looking at garnering the sufficient number of individuals whom have been vaccine injured, for the purpose of mounting a National Class Action, targeting the very approval of the Covid-19 vaccines by Skerritt (TGA) and Hunt (Department of Health), as well as the complicity of the Vaccine companies themselves. This is a longer-term plan strategy and will require many vaccine-injured individuals to come forward. We invite you to express your interest, again or for the first time, in being part of the National Class Action by clicking the link on our website.
Maatouks Law Group are proud to announce that a High Court Challenge was filed by behalf of our client, The Youth Advocate Inc. This is in relation to the critical issue of mandatorily vaccinating children between 0-19 years of age. This matter was awaiting leave to proceed, but at this stage was rejected. Our client is working on rectifying this issue and we are also working on our own separate case also. This type of case is critical, as many parents are using the COVID-19 (and other vaccination issues) in family disputes, and the Family Court of Australia is siding with the parent who wants to forcibly vaccinate the child. In many instances, particularly the very young; children are incapable of providing informed consent, and in consideration of the lack of data in the efficacy and safety of these vaccines in children; it is critical that this issue is tested in the High Court of Australia. We will keep you informed in due course as this matter develops.
We note that we are also working on various other potential High Court cases touching these similar topics for children and adults with different perspectives and lead Plaintiff's.
Our strategy now, is to diversify our challenges so that we can use all arguments in every single jurisdiction. The reality is; that every state and territory is acting unilaterally and inconsistently, both within its own legislative framework, as well as inconsistently with the Biosecurity Act at the Federal level.
Please visit the following link to view the videos and posts by Maatouks Law Group and Peter Maatouk concerning these matters.
YouTube: Peter Maatouk
Please note; that all donations that are made to this cause are made voluntarily and no refunds will be given if you change your mind. Money raised will be applied to the various actions stated herein as needed and decided by our firm.
We do however, wish to reiterate, that every dollar raised is properly accounted for in our Law Society approved Trust Account. We keep records of all transactions in and out of this account. We offer full transparency with respect to all money raised, collected and spent.
Maatouks Law Group is a respectable law firm, that has been established for decades; we have 4 offices located in Sydney CBD, Liverpool, Narellan and Penrith.
Our Principal, Mr Peter Maatouk; has been working tirelessly for months (for FREE), assisting thousands of people across Australia. He has not only dedicated his time and efforts at not charge, but he has also spent his own money to advance this cause, in the interest of Public Justice and Freedoms.
The funds that are donated and raised here are NOT used to pay Mr Maatouk in any way with respect to all the work that he is doing to help these people. This is being carried out on a Pro Bono basis personally by Mr Maatouk, as much as is humanly possible, subject to time and availability.
Mr Maatouk has always been accessible and contactable by any member of the public. He has put his face and details out there in the public domain and literally takes calls 24/7. No other Law Firm or Solicitor does this and no other solicitor makes themselves so accessible to the Australian Public.